Comey cites Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas in arguing against Halligan’s appointment
The fate of James Comey’s indictment could eventually land at the Supreme Court.
Jordan Rubin
James Comey moves to dismiss case based on ‘vindictive’ and ‘selective’ prosecution
James Comey filed his motion to dismiss the criminal charges against him based on “vindictive” and “selective” prosecution.
Does the Supreme Court hate drugs more than it loves guns?
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide another Second Amendment case, U.S. v. Hemani, in which they'll take up the...
The Roberts Court already ‘abandons its duty’ — and the term’s just getting started
This week’s Deadline: Legal Newsletter highlights the battle over voting rights, the death penalty, Alex Jones’ rejection, a possible Trump...
Ask Jordan: Could Pam Bondi or Lindsey Halligan be disbarred for bringing Trump’s retribution?
“Can a case be brought to a state bar against Pam Bondi and/or Lindsey Halligan for unethical behavior or corruption?...
Not guilty verdict in ICE case sends stark message to Trump DOJ’s political prosecutions
Protester Sidney Reid was acquitted in Washington, D.C., on Thursday of a misdemeanor charge after grand jurors declined to approve...
Trump appointees split on decision approving school ban for ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ shirts
A divided federal appellate panel approved a ban on Michigan middle schoolers wearing “Let’s Go Brandon” sweatshirts to school.
Sotomayor says GOP-appointed Supreme Court wing ‘abandons its duty’ in death penalty case
The Supreme Court refused to halt another execution Wednesday night despite dissent from the court’s three Democratic appointees.
Justice Kavanaugh insists on imposing a made-up time limit on the law and the Constitution
The Supreme Court is on the verge of further limiting voting rights, thanks in part to Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s unfounded...
The Voting Rights Act is at further risk as the Roberts Court hears Louisiana map appeal
The justices will hear oral argument Wednesday in Louisiana v. Callais, a case that could further gut the landmark law...
